Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TiFe intermetallics are attractive solid-state hydrogen storage materials, but the atomistic role of nanoscale morphology in H 2 adsorption and release remains unclear. Here, self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding calculations were used to study H 2 adsorption on a 65-atom TiFe nanoparticle Ti 33 Fe 32 , benchmarked against TiFe(100) and TiFe(110) slabs. Screening of 134 nanoparticle adsorption minima shows that Fe-containing bridge, hollow-like, and top motifs form a moderate-binding molecular H 2 adsorption class, whereas Ti-top sites form a weaker-binding class. Sequential loading up to 48H 2 molecules gives a calculated surface-adsorption upper bound of 2.79 wt% H 2 for the isolated 65-atom nanoparticle model. Molecular H 2 is largely preserved on the nanoparticle, whereas TiFe(100) favors dissociation, with a dissociative preference (ΔE) as low as −2.25 eV. Electronic analysis links this contrast to reduced charge transfer and weaker metal–H hybridization on the nanoparticle. Langmuir–van't Hoff screening identifies Ti-top sites favorable for near-ambient release, providing design guidance for TiFe-based hydrogen storage materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurban et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: