Key result
Mibefradil increases survival by ~61% vs no treatment in a chronic heart failure rat model.
Why the study?
Calcium channel blockers have shown no or detrimental effects in chronic heart failure due to negative inotropic effects, but selective T-channel blockade might be beneficial.
Absolute Event Rate: 71% vs 44%
Preclinical evaluation demonstrates increased survival in heart failure, suggesting therapeutic benefits of selective T-channel calcium blockade.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the effects of mibefradil on survival, hemodynamic variables and cardiac remodeling in a rat model of chronic heart failure (HF) and to compare these effects with those of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril. BACKGROUND: The use of calcium channel blocking agents in chronic HF has been disappointing. Most studies have shown that these drugs have either no or even detrimental effects due in part to the negative inotropic effects they induce. Mibefradil is a calcium channel blocker that selectively blocks T channels and displays moderately negative inotropic properties only at high doses. Because T channels are upregulated in the hypertrophied heart and could mediate hypertrophic signals and increase arrhythmogenicity, blockade of these channels might be beneficial in chronic HF. METHODS: Rats were subjected to coronary artery ligation and 9 months of treatment with mibefradil (15 mg/kg body weight per day) or cilazapril (10 mg/kg per day) or no treatment. Survival and systolic blood pressure were assessed over the 9-month treatment period, after which cardiac hemodynamic variables and structure were determined. RESULTS: Mibefradil increased survival rate to the same extent as cilazapril (71% for mibefradil vs. 75% for cilazapril and 44% for no treatment). Mibefradil decreased systolic blood pressure, although to a lesser extent than cilazapril. Both treatments decreased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and central venous pressures, without any change in the first derivative of LV pressure over time or heart rate. Mibefradil decreased LV weight (although less than cilazapril) without affecting right ventricular weight. Finally, both drugs normalized LV collagen density. CONCLUSIONS: Mibefradil in a rat model improved survival to the same extent as an ACE inhibitor, without impairing LV function, and was associated with a reduction in LV weight and fibrosis. Thus, mibefradil might be beneficial in the treatment of chronic HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulder et al. (1997) studied Chronic heart failure (rat model). Mibefradil vs. Cilazapril (10 mg/kg per day) or no treatment was evaluated on Survival rate. In a rat model of chronic heart failure, 9-month treatment with mibefradil increased survival to 71% compared to 44% with no treatment, similar to the 75% survival seen with cilazapril.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: