Key result
Greater procedural experience with pentaspline PFA linked to a ~96% reduction in acute incomplete lesions.
Why the study?
The learning curve for combined pentaspline pulsed-field ablation with pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation and the impact of anatomical factors on lesion completeness in persistent AF are incompletely defined.
Does procedural experience improve acute lesion completeness during pentaspline pulsed-field ablation with posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=182)
Does procedural experience improve acute lesion completeness during pentaspline pulsed-field ablation with posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Procedural experience significantly improves lesion completeness during pentaspline PFA with PVI and PWI, with the steepest learning curve in the first 20 cases.
Operator experience linked to fewer incomplete lesions in pentaspline PFA; hypothesis-generating for training thresholds and needs prospective validation.
Background Pentaspline pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the learning curve associated with combined PVI + PWI and the contribution of anatomical factors to acute lesion completeness remain incompletely defined. Methods We analyzed 182 consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing fluoroscopy‐ and intracardiac echocardiography–guided PFA. Acute incomplete lesions were defined as residual conduction requiring additional PFA applications after systematic remapping. Learning phases were identified using segmented logistic regression and sequential block analysis. Multivariable models evaluated procedural phase, left atrial volume (LAV), and posterior wall geometry. Results A learning curve was observed, with the greatest reduction in incomplete lesion formation occurring during the first 20 procedures. Incomplete lesions occurred in 55% of cases 1–20 (early phase), 32% of cases 21–160 (intermediate phase), and 4.8% of cases ≥ 161 (late phase). Procedural phase was the dominant determinant of incomplete lesions, with approximately 24‐fold and 9‐fold higher odds during the early and intermediate phases, respectively. Larger LAV showed a modest independent association (OR 1.009 per mL), whereas posterior wall geometry was not independently associated. Mid‐term arrhythmia recurrence did not differ across phases, although follow‐up duration was shorter in the late phase. Conclusions Lesion completeness during pentaspline PFA with PVI + PWI improves progressively with increasing procedural experience. Although larger LAV may contribute modestly to incomplete lesion formation, procedural experience appears to play the predominant role. Systematic electroanatomical remapping remains important for identifying and correcting incomplete lesions even after substantial procedural experience has been accumulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yagishita et al. (2026) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=182). Early procedural phase (cases 1-20) vs. Late procedural phase (cases ≥ 161) was evaluated on Acute incomplete lesions (OR 24). Incomplete lesion formation during pentaspline pulsed-field ablation decreased significantly with procedural experience, occurring in 55% of early cases versus 4.8% of late cases (OR 24).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: