This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose To describe the real-world clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of high-risk localized prostate cancer (HR LPC) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and perioperative hormonal therapy (HT) in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted, utilizing data from chart review in Japan and from electronic medical records in South Korea and Taiwan (SK+T). Adults newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 2015 and June 2017, had one high-risk feature per NCCN guidelines, and received RP and perioperative HT were eligible. Data for Japan were reported separately from SK+T. Results There were 354 and 677 newly diagnosed HR LPC patients in Japan and in SK+T, respectively. Of these patients, 72.6% in Japan and 72.4% in SK+T received RP. A total of 72 (20.3%) HR LPC patients in Japan and 33 (4.9%) HR LPC patients in SK+T who received RP and perioperative HT were eligible for this study. In the Japan cohort, 95.8% of patients received neoadjuvant HT with a median duration of 7.1 months. In the SK+T cohort, 93.9% of patients received adjuvant HT with a median duration of 11.2 months. Negative tumor margins were observed in 87.5% and 45.5% of patients in the Japan and SK+T cohorts, respectively. Among patients who received neoadjuvant HT in the Japan cohort, 33.8% achieved pathologic complete response. Conclusion The proportion of HR LPC patients receiving RP was similar within developed countries in Asia, but the use of perioperative HT varied. Evidence-based strategies are needed to ensure optimal management of HR LPC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: