Key result
A back-mounted rebreather generating negative static lung load significantly increased the prevalence of extravascular lung water compared to an open-circuit system (80% vs 27%; P=0.008).
Why the study?
Immersion pulmonary edema affects divers across age and fitness levels, suggesting mechanical factors like static lung load contribute alongside cardiovascular predisposition.
Does a negative static lung load from a back-mounted rebreather increase extravascular lung water compared to an open-circuit system in healthy divers?
Does a negative static lung load from a back-mounted rebreather increase extravascular lung water compared to an open-circuit system in healthy divers?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 27%
p-value: p=.008
Extreme negative static lung load from back-mounted rebreathers significantly increases extravascular lung water and inspiratory work of breathing in healthy divers, independent of exertion.
Negative SLL from gas-source position may increase lung water during prone swimming; leaves open whether device positioning reduces IPE incidence.
Purpose: Immersion pulmonary edema (IPE) affects divers and swimmers across the age and fitness spectrum, including young, trained individuals, indicating that mechanical factors act alongside any cardiovascular predisposition. We hypothesized that an extreme negative static lung load (SLL), produced when the breathing-gas source sits shallower than the pulmonary centroid during prone swimming, increases extravascular lung water as a function of gas-source position rather than device type. Methods: This translational study combined a retrospective analysis of 21 rebreather-associated IPE cases in healthy professional divers (2009–2015) and a prospective cross-over study in 15 healthy volunteers who performed a standardized 30-minute prone finning exercise in cold water twice: with an open-circuit system (near-neutral SLL) and a back-mounted rebreather (negative SLL). Extravascular lung water was quantified by ultrasound lung comets (ULC); inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) and mean hydrostatic load were measured in immersion with a pneumo-baro-tachograph across body positions. Results: All 21 cases (median age 32) occurred in divers free of cardiovascular disease with a back-mounted gas source generating negative SLL; 34% developed without exertion, and depth was not distinguishing (median 21 m, range 7-80). The prone position imposed a mean hydrostatic load near -32 cmH2O and an inspiratory WOB of approximately 3.3 J/L, versus 1.3-1.5 J/L when vertical. After diving, increased extravascular lung water (ULC > 5) was more prevalent with negative SLL than open-circuit (80% vs 27%; McNemar P =.008), despite a greater distance covered with open-circuit. Conclusions: An extreme negative SLL set by gas-source position is associated with markedly increased inspiratory loading and extravascular lung water, independent of exertion. These findings support continued consideration of SLL in the physiological evaluation and safety assessment of occupational life-support systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prevautel et al. (2026) studied Immersion pulmonary edema (n=36). Back-mounted rebreather (negative static lung load) vs. Open-circuit system (near-neutral static lung load) was evaluated on Increased extravascular lung water (ULC > 5) (p=.008). A back-mounted rebreather generating negative static lung load significantly increased the prevalence of extravascular lung water compared to an open-circuit system (80% vs 27%; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: