Optimization plays a vital role in scientific research and practical applications. However, translating a concrete optimization problem described in natural language into a mathematical formulation and selecting a suitable solver require substantial domain expertise. We introduce OptimAI, a framework for solving optimization problems described in natural language by leveraging LLM-powered AI agents, and achieve superior performance over current state-of-the-art methods. Our framework is built upon the following key roles: (1) a formulator that translates natural language problem descriptions into mathematical formulations; (2) a planner that constructs a high-level solution strategy prior to execution; and (3) a coder and a code critic capable of interacting with the environment and reflecting to refine future actions. Ablation studies confirm that all roles are essential; removing the planner or code critic results in 5.8× and 3.1× drops in productivity, respectively. Furthermore, we introduce UCB-based debug scheduling to dynamically switch between alternative plans, yielding an additional 3.3× productivity gain. Our design emphasizes multi-agent collaboration, and our experiments confirm that combining diverse models leads to performance gains. The best OptimAI configurations attain 88.1% accuracy on the NLP4LP dataset and 82.3% on the Optibench dataset, reducing error rates by 58% and 52%, respectively, over prior best results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thind et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: