Key result
SARIMA outperforms deep learning for HFMD forecasting, cutting prediction error ~82%.
Why the study?
No domestic study has compared deep learning models with classical baselines for short-term forecasting of HFMD sentinel data in Korea using multi-seed evaluation and formal accuracy testing across the COVID-19 disruption.
Absolute Event Rate: 1.73% vs 9.66%
p-value: p=<0.001
Classical SARIMA models significantly outperform deep learning architectures for short-term forecasting of HFMD sentinel rates, providing a reliable basis for automated public health alerts.
SARIMA may suit short-term HFMD surveillance forecasting; leaves open whether deep learning can outperform with larger multimodal datasets.
Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a common pediatric infection in Korea, tracked weekly through Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency sentinel surveillance, but no domestic study has compared deep learning models with classical baselines using multi-seed evaluation and formal accuracy testing across the COVID-19 disruption.Five deep learning architectures (deep neural network, one-dimensional convolutional neural network, single-and multilayer long short-term memory [LSTM], and a convolutional neural network-LSTM hybrid) were compared with three classical baselines (naive, seasonal naive, and seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average [SARIMA]) for one-week-ahead forecasting of the Korean HFMD sentinel rate, using weekly data from 2011 to 2019 as the primary analysis and through 2025 as a robustness analysis.SARIMA achieved a test mean absolute error of 1.73, four to six times lower than the best deep learning model.The Diebold-Mariano test confirmed this advantage at P<0.001 under both loss functions, with the ranking robust to input window length and the COVID-19 disruption.Single-seed evaluation produced a misleading deep learning ranking, supporting multi-seed reporting in deep learning forecasting research.These findings support a deployable SARIMA-based alert pipeline keyed to the 20-per-1,000 outpatient threshold for childcare facility advisories, sentinel-clinic staffing, and hand hygiene campaigns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied Hand, foot, and mouth disease (n=783). Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) vs. Deep learning architectures (DNN, CNN1D, LSTM, CNN-LSTM) was evaluated on Test mean absolute error (MAE) for one-week-ahead forecasting (primary analysis) (p=<0.001). The SARIMA model achieved a test mean absolute error of 1.73 for one-week-ahead forecasting of HFMD sentinel rates, significantly outperforming the best deep learning model (MAE 9.66, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: