Key result
GLP-1RA shows similar cardiorenal and mortality outcomes compared to SGLT2i in diabetic CKD.
Why the study?
Limited comparative evidence exists on nephroprotective outcomes of GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i in older, clinically complex patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-advanced CKD.
Does GLP-1RA compared to SGLT2i reduce the composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality in older US Veterans with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3-4?
Cohort (n=106,719)
Does GLP-1RA compared to SGLT2i reduce the composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality in older US Veterans with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3-4?
Hazard Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.94–1.07)
GLP-1RA and SGLT2i initiation showed comparable overall risks for a composite of ESKD, kidney function decline, or mortality in older US Veterans with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3-4, though SGLT2i may offer advantages for specific kidney endpoints.
Similar composite risk supports clinical equipoise in older veterans with T2D and CKD; leaves open kidney-specific SGLT2i advantages for RCTs.
Objective: To address limited comparative evidence in older, clinically complex patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), we compared nephroprotective outcomes after GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i initiation among US Veterans aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3–4 during 2016–2025. Methods: Within the U.S. Veterans Health Administration database, we identified individuals with type 2 diabetes and CKD stage 3-4 (eGFR 15 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) initiating GLP-1RA vs SGLT2i. GLP-1RA formulations approved for weight loss were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality, with individual components being secondary outcomes. After controlling for >100 covariates including comorbidities, medications, clinical parameters, and laboratory results using propensity score matching weights, we estimated hazard ratios and rate differences. Analyses were stratified by CKD stages, HbA1c, and body mass index. Results: We identified 28,365 GLP-1RA and 78,354 SGLT2i initiators [mean (SD) age: 74 (6) years vs. 76 (6) years]. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, the weighted risks for the primary outcome were similar between treatment groups [HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.94, 1.07); RD per 1,000 person-years (95% CI): 0.0002 (-0.0037, 0.0042)], mainly attributed to the similar risk for all-cause mortality. The risks of the secondary outcomes were higher in GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i initiators, but higher risks for sustained kidney function decline and ESKD. Findings were consistent across variations in baseline CKD stage, history of CVD, BMI, and HbA1c level. Absolute rate differences for major kidney disease events and ESKD were larger in patients with more advanced CKD stages. Conclusions: These findings suggest broadly comparable overall kidney and survival outcomes, with potential advantages of SGLT2is for the risks of kidney function decline and incident ESKD across metabolic subgroups in this older adult cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Htoo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD stages 3-4) (n=106,719). GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i was evaluated on Composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94, 1.07). Initiation of GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i in older US Veterans with type 2 diabetes and CKD was associated with a similar risk of ESKD, 40% eGFR decline, or mortality (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: