Key result
Trainee-performed emergency CABG shows no significant mortality difference vs. consultants despite higher stroke incidence.
Why the study?
Little is known about the early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing emergency CABG performed by cardiothoracic trainees.
Does emergency CABG performed by trainees compared to consultants affect early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing first-time isolated emergency CABG?
Cohort (n=7,494)
Yes
Does emergency CABG performed by trainees compared to consultants affect early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing first-time isolated emergency CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.1% vs 9.3%
p-value: p=0.073
Emergency CABG performed by trainees as first operators is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to consultants, though it is associated with greater use of cardiopulmonary bypass and a higher incidence of postoperative stroke.
Supports supervised trainee performance of emergency CABG; leaves open stroke risk mitigation strategies in observational data.
Background: Little is known about the early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed by cardiothoracic trainees. Method: All patients who underwent first-time, isolated emergency CABG in the United Kingdom between 1996 and April 2019 were identified from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Trends in surgical operator grade (trainee or consultant), early clinical outcomes, and the use of surgical techniques (on-pump versus off-pump) were evaluated. Results: A total of 7494 patients were included in the study. The median age was 67.9 years (interquartile range (IQR): 59.3–74.8), and 71% were male. Of these, 983 patients (13.1%) underwent emergency CABG performed by a surgeon in training. The proportion of emergency procedures performed by trainees fluctuated around 10% in 2000, decreased to 6.1% in 2002, and peaked at 20.6% in 2008. After propensity score matching, no differences were observed between trainees and consultants in mortality (9.3% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.073), incidence of return to theatre for bleeding (5.0% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.28), need for postoperative dialysis (6.2% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.39), deep sternal wound infection (0% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.26), or number of grafts (2.84% vs. 2.88%; p = 0.89). However, trainee-operated cases were associated with greater use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (92% vs. 87%; p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (5.3% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.009). Conclusion: Emergency CABG remains a high-risk operation with substantial in-hospital mortality. Trainees appear to have good exposure as first operators, with no increase in in-hospital mortality compared with consultants. However, trainees make more frequent use of CPB and have a significantly higher incidence of stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strong et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=7,494). Emergency CABG performed by a trainee surgeon vs. Emergency CABG performed by a consultant surgeon was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.073). Emergency CABG performed by trainees was not associated with a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to consultants (7.1% vs 9.3%, p=0.073), though trainees had a higher incidence of stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: