Key result
FoCUS shows 100% concordance with formal echocardiography for LV function in pediatric myocarditis.
Why the study?
Pediatric acute myocarditis presents with nonspecific symptoms causing diagnostic delays, and reports on the use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) for its diagnosis are limited.
Does focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) provide concordant qualitative left ventricular function assessment compared to formal echocardiography in pediatric patients with acute myocarditis?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) provide concordant qualitative left ventricular function assessment compared to formal echocardiography in pediatric patients with acute myocarditis?
Focused cardiac ultrasound is a useful adjunctive tool that provides concordant LV systolic function assessment compared to formal echocardiography in pediatric acute myocarditis.
Supports focused cardiac ultrasound for LV function in pediatric myocarditis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute myocarditis is a life-threatening condition with nonspecific symptoms that often lead to diagnostic delays. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is used to assess cardiac function in pediatric emergency care; however, reports on its use for acute myocarditis are limited. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of FoCUS used to aid in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis and to assess the concordance of qualitative left ventricular (LV) function assessments between FoCUS and formal echocardiography. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single tertiary pediatric emergency department (PED) between March 2020 and December 2025. Patients diagnosed with acute myocarditis who underwent FoCUS were included. Patients diagnosed with acute myocarditis before their PED visit or those who did not undergo FoCUS nor echocardiography performed by a pediatric cardiologist were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included in the study. The median age was 8 years, and 36.4% were male. Chest pain and hypotension were the most common indications for FoCUS. FoCUS was performed by novice users and FoCUS experts in seven and four patients, respectively. Parasternal long-axis, parasternal short-axis, apical four-chamber, subxiphoid four-chamber, and subxiphoid inferior vena cava views were obtained in eight, five, two, six, and five patients, respectively. Nine patients had abnormal LV systolic function. Qualitative FoCUS assessment of LV systolic function was concordant with formal echocardiography in all included cases. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that FoCUS can be a useful adjunctive tool for expediting the diagnosis of acute myocarditis in a PED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pediatric acute myocarditis (n=11). Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) vs. Formal echocardiography was evaluated on Concordance of qualitative left ventricular (LV) function assessments between FoCUS and formal echocardiography. Focused cardiac ultrasound assessment of left ventricular systolic function was 100% concordant with formal echocardiography in 11 pediatric patients with acute myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: