Key result
Dipper-to-non-dipper blood pressure transition linked to ~8-fold higher preeclampsia risk in pregnant women with hypertension.
Why the study?
The associations of circadian rhythm changes in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring across gestational stages with preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcomes in chronic hypertension were unclear.
Does transition to a non-dipper blood pressure pattern predict preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with chronic hypertension?
Cohort (n=107)
Does transition to a non-dipper blood pressure pattern predict preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with chronic hypertension?
Odds Ratio: 8.65 (95% CI 1.89–39.67)
p-value: p=<0.05
Dynamic circadian pattern changes in ABPM during pregnancy, specifically transitioning to or maintaining a non-dipper pattern, are associated with increased risks of preeclampsia and adverse perinatal outcomes in women with chronic hypertension.
Supports serial ABPM for risk stratification in chronic hypertension pregnancy; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions before practice change.
This study aimed to investigate circadian rhythm changes in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) across gestational stages and their associations with preeclampsia (PE) and adverse perinatal outcomes (APO) in chronic hypertension. Method A total of 107 pregnancies with chronic hypertension underwent ABPMs before 14 weeks(first) and after 20 weeks of gestation (second). Based on circadian rhythm changes across ABPMs, four groups were classified: persistent dipper (D D, n = 33),dipper to non-dipper (D-ND, n = 22), persistent non-dipper (ND-ND, n = 33), non-dipper to dipper (ND-D, n = 19). Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations of ABPM parameters, circadian rhythm transitions with risks of PE/APO. Results The D-ND group had elevated nighttime BP changes compared to D D, ND-D showed lower nighttime BP compared to ND-ND( P < 0.05) despite more daytime BP percentage changes across ABPMs. Only in 2nd ABPM, nighttime hypertension and Non-Dipper pattern were significantly associated with PE(aOR = 5.08 and 11.51)/Maternal APO. The D-ND group had higher rates of PE(68.2%) and adverse outcomes(59.1%) compared with D D group, while ND-D had lower rates(PE 15.8%, APO 21.1%) compared with ND-ND group( P < 0.05). Across multiple adjustment models(nighttime BP, 24 h mean BP in ABPM, office BP), both D-ND and ND-ND transitions remained increased risks for PE [aOR(95%CI): 8.65 (1.89–39.67) and 7.09 (1.66–30.22)] and APO [aOR(95%CI): 8.53 (1.70–42.79) and 6.79 (1.45–31.83)] ( P < 0.05) compared with D D. Conclusion Dynamic circadian patterns changes in ABPM were associated with risks of PE/APO in pregnancy with chronic hypertension, independent of absolute BP levels.Serial ABPMs enable risk stratification for further monitoring and improving perinatal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in chronic hypertension in pregnancy (n=107). Dipper to non-dipper circadian rhythm transition vs. Persistent dipper circadian rhythm was evaluated on preeclampsia (aOR 8.65, 95% CI 1.89-39.67, p=<0.05). A dipper to non-dipper circadian rhythm transition in pregnant women with chronic hypertension increased the risk of preeclampsia compared to persistent dippers (aOR 8.65; 95% CI 1.89-39.67; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: