Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Amorphous ribbon brazing filler metals produced by rapid melt quenching form a distinct class of high-temperature brazing materials; a few ductile microcrystalline ribbons are treated as boundary cases. This review systematizes the four industrial families of such fillers: copper–phosphorus (Cu–Ni–Sn–P), titanium (Ti–Cu–Ni, Ti–Zr–Cu–Ni(–Be)), zirconium (Zr–Ti–Cu–Ni, Zr–Cu–Fe–Be), and nickel–metalloid (Ni–Cr–Si–B, Ni–Cr–P) alloys, together with the closely allied iron-based fillers. This selection is no accident: to become the basis of a commercial filler metal, an amorphous alloy must simultaneously satisfy five criteria (C1–C5) of brazing temperature, glass formation, base-material compatibility, ribbon manufacturability, and cost and safety, which are formulated here as a single cross-system checklist with operational thresholds. The class itself exists because in deep eutectics, the depressant and glass-former functions can coincide. Transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding, for which the thin homogeneous ribbon is a particularly suitable carrier, runs through the review as a unifying thread. The structural heredity of the ribbon-derived melt and the complementarity of the families by base material are discussed; ductile silver and aluminum fillers serve as a negative control delineating the boundary of the class, and the criteria are applied predictively to compare the families and to select a filler metal for a specific task.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivannikov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: