Objectives: Most existing machine learning (ML) models are trained on mixed-age samples and rarely examine whether performance varies across life stages.We compared age-stratified ML models for predicting periodontitis in a nationally representative sample of Korean adult population.Methods: We trained five ML models using 16 features from the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES Ⅶ) to predict periodontitis according to four age strata: adults ≥19 years (n=12,689), 19-44 years (n=4,847), 45-64 years (n=4,861), and ≥65 years (n=2,981).The performance of all models was evaluated with stratified 5-fold cross-validation, combined with class-weight correction to address the imbalance in periodontitis prevalence, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated using 1,000 bootstraps resamples.Results: Predictive performance declined with advancing age: the best-performing model achieved an AUC of 0.763 (95% CI, 0.745-0.782) in adults aged 19-44 years, 0.684 (0.668-0.699) in adults aged 45-64 years, and only 0.567 (0.547-0.587) in adults aged ≥65 years, corresponding to an absolute AUC reduction of approximately 0.196 between the youngest and oldest strata.This agerelated degradation was observed uniformly across all five algorithms.Moreover, in the ≥65 years stratum none of the tested algorithms reached clinically useful discrimination (all AUCs <0.60 with upper 95% confidence limits below 0.60).Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the predictive value of survey-based features for periodontitis is strongly age-dependent.Therefore, ML-based periodontal screening should be designed and validated separately for each age stratum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: