Generative AI is becoming embedded in infrastructures of knowledge, culture, and political authority, giving rise to an emerging AI society . This transformation did not arise ex nihilo : it is rooted in the platform society whose infrastructures, data, and political economies it reorganizes. The article traces this transition across three domains. Economically , platform-era monopoly mechanisms based on network effects are giving way to cognitive lock-in, enabling rent extraction through dependence on personalized systems. Epistemically , the predictive logic of platforms is being displaced by a generative one, in which theory is embedded in technological infrastructures and populations are simulated rather than sampled. Politically , platform-era struggles over visibility are shifting toward alignment politics: contests over what models can say, do, and refuse. Together, these shifts mark a qualitative change in mediation. We ask which insights from platform society scholarship should be carried forward, and which reconsidered, in ongoing critical research on generative AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Törnberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: