BackgroundOverhead crane operators are exposed to a high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), partly due to poorly fitted cab seat designs that do not match operator anthropometry.ObjectiveThis study examined the mismatch between cab seat dimensions and the anthropometric characteristics of crane operators and proposed an ergonomic redesign to reduce MSD risks.MethodsSixty-four operators were evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) method during eight key tasks. Anthropometric measurements were compared with existing seat dimensions. A new seat was modelled in 3D MAX software, incorporating operator anthropometry.ResultsSignificant mismatches were identified in seat height, handle height, backrest width, seat depth, and backrest height. The proposed design included a seat height of 41-56 cm, a width of 47 cm, a depth of 53 cm, and a head/neck support height of 108 cm. Simulation showed that the redesigned seat reduced RULA risk scores from 4 (high risk) to 1 (low risk).ConclusionThe findings demonstrate the importance of integrating ergonomic and anthropometric principles into cab seat design. The redesigned seat offers improved postural support, reduces MSD risk, and may enhance operator comfort and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: