Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) primarily heavily relies on clinical interviews and subjective symptom reporting, highlighting the urgent need for objective biomarkers. This study aimed to characterize MDD-related alterations in rapid electrophysiological network dynamics by integrating electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis and source-space functional connectivity (FC) analysis, and to evaluate the classification performance of these features and their combination. Resting-state EEG data were collected from 115 patients with MDD and 43 healthy controls (HCs). EEG microstate and source-space FC features were extracted and compared between groups. Group differences were assessed with correction for multiple comparisons. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was applied to evaluate the classification performance of microstate features, FC features, and their combination. A sensitivity analysis adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index was also performed. Compared to HCs, MDD patients showed a significant increased transition probability from microstate D to B after false discovery rate (FDR) correction ( P FDR = 0.048). In the source-space FC analysis, several edge-wise differences were observed at the uncorrected threshold of P < 0.05; however, none of these FC differences survived FDR correction. In the SVM classification analysis, the weighted fusion model achieved the numerically highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.759 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.660–0.847), compared with the FC-only model (AUC = 0.747, 95% CI: 0.642–0.841) and the microstate-only model (AUC = 0.724, 95% CI: 0.623–0.818). Patients with MDD showed altered EEG microstate transition dynamics, particularly an increased transition probability from microstate D to B. Several edge-wise FC differences between patients with MDD and HCs were observed, however, no edge-level FC differences survived correction for multiple comparisons. The integration of microstate and FC features may provide potentially useful EEG-derived information for machine learning classification, but its generalizability and clinical utility require validation in larger independent cohorts. The study was registered on http://www.chictr.org.cn/ and the registration number was ChiCTR2200057365 (registration date: March 9, 2022).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: