Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a severe and potentially life-threatening opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, especially those with hematologic malignancies.Although routine prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has significantly reduced its incidence, breakthrough infections still occur, most commonly due to poor adherence to prophylactic therapy.This case report highlights the risks of non-adherence to PJP prophylaxis in adolescents and underscores the importance of early diagnostic suspicion and multidisciplinary management.A 15-year-old female patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented during her seventh month of maintenance therapy (methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine) in a compromised general condition with tachycardia, tachypnea, and hypoxemia, following a 24-hour history of fever and dry cough.Heteroanamnestic data revealed prolonged non-adherence to TMP-SMX prophylaxis.Imaging showed diffuse bilateral interstitial infiltrates on chest radiography and ground-glass opacities on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).PJP was confirmed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from bronchoalveolar lavage and a positive serum 1,3-β-Dglucan test.Treatment included intravenous TMP-SMX, corticosteroids, and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy.The course was complicated by pancytopenia, likely secondary to TMP-SMX, and febrile neutropenia.A multidisciplinary approach, including social and psychiatric support, addressed nonadherence.The patient was discharged in good condition; maintenance therapy was continued, and prophylaxis was switched to monthly aerosolized pentamidine administered in the hospital setting.PJP prevention in pediatric oncology remains a significant challenge, as inconsistent adherence can rapidly lead to severe clinical deterioration.Our experience suggests that successful outcomes depend on addressing psychosocial barriers early.Transitioning to supervised, hospital-administered alternatives, such as aerosolized pentamidine, alongside multidisciplinary support, may help ensure adherence to prophylaxis in vulnerable oncology patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelcic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: