Amongst the most central results in proof theory are normal-form results for deductions. Such results were first presented, not by David Hilbert, who first formulated the idea of a mathematical theory of mathematical proofs (in 1904), but by Paul Hertz (in 1922). Hertz’ work (and relationship to Hilbert) has not received the attention it deserves. I discuss both in detail, as well as the theoretical role normal-form results play within proof theory. An unpublished manuscript by Heinrich Behmann commenting on Hertz’ work is published (with translation) as an appendix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moritz Bodner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: