Forests are increasingly affected by climate change, highlighting the necessity of adaptive management to sustain ecosystem services. Yet adaptation is complicated by the interplay between ecological and socioeconomic considerations. We used an informed questionnaire to survey a selected group of forest professionals across different European sites, focusing on how perceptions of climate and socioeconomic change drive adaptive management choices. Here we show that professionals broadly agree on the negative impacts of climate change, with drought emerging as the dominant high-risk factor, while perceived socioeconomic change reflects rising timber demand and prices alongside higher operational costs. Professionals rank species diversity, mixing broadleaf and conifer species, and assisted natural regeneration as the priority adaptive measures, yet anticipated timber price increases lead a quarter of respondents to favor maintaining or increasing conifer shares. Economic expectations can change adaptation choices, highlighting a tension between ecological resilience and socioeconomic priorities that forest policy needs to address.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djahangard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: