Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper argues for three main claims: (i) belonging can play an important role for epistemic self-trust; (ii) epistemic self-trust can be construed plurally so as to include not only its intellectual or propositional dimensions but also its experiential (practical, tacit, embodied, and affective) dimensions; and (iii) self-trust, plurally construed, can serve as a mechanism of epistemic repair to counteract various forms of epistemic injustice that undermine epistemic agency along these propositional and experiential dimensions. To make this threefold argument, I turn to the context of neurodiversity and neuronormativity, which helpfully illustrates the plural dimensions of epistemic agency, epistemic self-trust, and epistemic repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amandine Catala (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: