Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This proposal integrates epistemic reputation into social epistemology, highlighting its role in testimonial belief formation.
I propose a novel account of epistemic reputation as the social standing of agents, groups, and institutions based on their epistemic profiles within a community. Using a functionalist approach, I argue that epistemic reputation is pervasive in our societies because it facilitates navigation within social epistemic networks. Consequently, it holds significant importance as second-order evidence in testimonial belief formation. This proposal integrates reputation research, which has traditionally been relegated to the periphery of social epistemology, into the core of epistemology of testimony. As a result, we gain a deeper understanding of the burden and epistemic responsibility associated with epistemic injustice. This approach also promises to illuminate the concept of humility for experts in a new light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dominik Jarczewski (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: