Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Handgrip strength is commonly used to assess muscle strength in critically ill patients, including those with intensive care unit-acquired weakness. While the reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer have been established, its responsiveness remains unknown. This study evaluated the responsiveness of handgrip strength measured with the K-force grip dynamometer in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study, intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients were assessed at baseline and after 1 week. Responsiveness was examined using effect sizes and standardized response means. The Medical Research Council sum score was included as a clinical comparator of global measure strength. Changes over time were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included. Dominant handgrip strength increased from 2650 g to 3450 g, with an effect size of r = 0.86 and standardized response means of 0.77 (p < 0.001). Non-dominant handgrip strength increased from 2,700 g to 3,783 g, with an effect size of r = 0.90 and SRM of 0.70 (p < 0.001). Medical Research Council sum score increased from 26.5 to 30.0 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The K-force grip dynamometer demonstrated strong responsiveness in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness, supporting its use for detecting short-term changes in handgrip strength in critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iperen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: