Global change drivers are reshaping agroecosystems and their sustained functions worldwide. While soil microorganisms underpin the resilience of these systems, the individual and interactive effects of multiple anthropogenic stressors on microbial community structure and function using large-scale field experiments remain poorly understood. Here, we utilize a full-factorial field experiment in a subtropical agroecosystem to investigate how land-use intensity, cattle grazing intensity, and altered precipitation regimes interact to shape soil microbiomes. Combining microbiome sequencing with network analyses and functional predictions, we evaluated the effects of these drivers on prokaryotic and fungal diversity, composition, predicted functional profiles, and community structure. Land-use intensity emerged as the primary driver of microbial responses, explaining 25% and 13% of the variation in community composition for prokaryotes and fungi, respectively. Compared to intensively managed pastures, semi-natural pastures had significantly different community composition for prokaryotes and fungi and exhibited 22% higher fungal diversity. Semi-natural pastures had greater representation of decomposer taxa and predicted denitrification-related genes, whereas N 2 -fixation-related genes were more abundant in intensively managed pastures. Surprisingly, intensively managed pastures showed higher network modularity but lower network richness, suggesting a trade-off between community compartmentalization and complexity under intensive land management. Grazing and precipitation manipulations induced core microbiome changes within land-use intensities but had no impact on overall community structure and no significant interactions with land use. Together, these findings suggest that long-term land-use legacies exert a persistent influence on soil microbial community structure, predicted function, and organization, shaping the context within which other global change drivers operate in subtropical agroecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: