This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Many climate change adaptation and mitigation actions in cities have potential co-impacts for health. This overview of relevant systematic reviews appraises and summarizes available evidence of the effects of implemented city-level actions addressing climate change and health impacts. On the basis of an assessment of confidence in the findings of the 60 reviews identified, the findings from 49 were included in the analysis. Most evidence focused on climate mitigation actions in the transport and buildings sectors and on urban form. Health co-benefits mainly resulted from increased active transport or improved housing. Where reviews provided measures of effect, they suggested only modest impacts on climate and health outcomes from single-sector actions. We found no published evidence of city-wide implementation of cross-sectoral transformative actions needed to achieve climate change targets and large-scale health co-benefits. More ambitious policies, together with rigorous evaluation of their impacts, are needed to attain and demonstrate these outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hutchinson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: