Background/Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the cell-mediated immune (CMI) profile—peripheral lymphocyte subsets, a 14-cytokine panel, and intracellular granzyme B/perforin expression—in children with acute IM compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and to describe its dynamics at symptom resolution in an exploratory paired subset. This is a descriptive, hypothesis-generating study. Methods: We enrolled 40 patients and 50 healthy controls, analyzing peripheral blood T cell subsets, intracellular granzyme B and perforin expression, and serum cytokines. Cross-sectional comparisons were made between the IM group and the healthy control group at diagnosis; in addition, paired samples obtained at clinical symptom resolution were available for a subset of 7 patients and were analyzed as an exploratory longitudinal comparison. Results: Patients showed significantly elevated leukocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes compared to healthy controls. Immunophenotyping revealed a higher total T cell count, with a lower CD4+ frequency but higher absolute count, and markedly increased CD8+ frequency and count. The B cell frequency was lower, while the NK cell frequency was lower but its absolute count was higher. A broad elevation in measured cytokines was observed, with significantly higher levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, TNF-α, TNF-β, and IFN-γ. A cytotoxic phenotype was also more pronounced, with increased proportions of granzyme B- and perforin-expressing cells among CD3+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD3-CD16/56+ NK cells. Conclusions: In conclusion, pediatric IM is characterized by profound changes in immune cell numbers and proportions, serum cytokine levels, and the expression of cytotoxic-effector molecules. These descriptive findings largely confirm the expected acute anti-EBV response and, in particular, reveal a pronounced coordinated CD8+/NK cytotoxic-effector signature. They warrant prospective, controlled study—ideally including a non-IM febrile/viral comparator—to determine whether such CMI parameters can support diagnosis or grade disease activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: