The early evolutionary history of modern domestic horses ( Equus caballus / Equus ferus caballus ), known as the DOM2 lineage, is well documented due to numerous archaeological and ancient DNA (aDNA) studies. Although many uncertainties remain in the domestication timeline, current evidence suggests that the domestication of modern horses began in the Pontic‐Caspian steppe at least ~2700 bce , or even earlier. However, it is not known how long remnant wild horse populations survived or when domestic horses were introduced into Northern Europe. In this study, we review the current knowledge of horse domestication, focusing on Northern Europe. We analyzed prehistoric horses from western Russia to assess the body sizes of wild horses from the Ivanovskaya site (5900–3800 bce ) in the Pontic‐Caspian steppe, and the body weight of one Lithuanian wild horse (4000–3800 bce ). Additionally, we analyzed body sizes of Late Bronze Age‐Early Roman Age horses (1100 bce –300 ce ) and reanalyzed body sizes and estimated rider weights of historic domestic horses from Lithuania (100–1400 ce ). We searched for pathological changes and signs of bit wear indicative of bridling. Furthermore, we investigated maternal genetic diversity by sequencing ancient mitochondrial DNA. We found that wild horses from Ivanovskaya were intermediate in body size between earlier and more recent horses of the Eurasian Steppe, and that the Lithuanian wild horse weighed only ~270 kg and Late Bronze Age‐Early Roman Age horses 200–300 kg. Lithuanian domestic horses were pony‐sized (< 130 cm on average). Potential bit wear was confirmed by an equine veterinarian in one Lithuanian horse tooth dated to 799–570 cal bce . Another tooth showed signs of the Equine Odontoclastic Tooth Resorption and Hypercementosis (EOTRH) condition. Mitochondrial DNA was successfully amplified from one Ivanovskaya wild horse along with 25 other ancient samples, including Lithuania's oldest domestic horse. mtDNA diversity was high, revealing several maternal lineages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: