Distillers’ grains (DGS) are widely used as a protein and energy source in feedlot diets. Complete replacement of DGS with heat-treated soybeans has resulted in enhanced growth performance. Soybeans are rich in essential amino acids, particularly lysine. Heat treating full-fat soybeans increases ruminal undegradable protein (RUP) concentration and replacing a portion of DGS with heat-treated soybeans may be a cost-effective approach to tailor amino acid supply to animal requirements. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of partially replacing modified distillers' grains (MDGS) with full-fat extruded (heat-treated) soybeans (ESB) on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers. Simmental x Angus steers (n = 128; 411 ± 24.5 kg) were allotted by initial BW to one of 16 drylot pens (n = 8 pens/treatment; 8 steers/pen) in a randomized complete block design. Basal diets (DM basis) were based on dry-rolled corn (DRC) and differed by protein supplement: 17.1% MDGS (ESB-0) or 10.4% MDGS and 5.8% ESB (ESB-6). Diets were isonitrogenous and ESB-6 contained 1% greater dietary fat. Steers were implanted with 200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2-17B (Revalor-200) on d 28. Lubabegron fumarate (Experior) was fed for 54 days at 36 mg/hd daily followed by a 4-d voluntary withdrawal. Growth performance and carcass traits were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4; distributions of QG, YG, and liver abscess incidence were analyzed as multinomial distributions using the GLIMMIX procedure. During the first 28-d, ESB-6 did not affect DMI or ADG (P ≥ 0.22) but tended to improve G:F by 4.5% (P = 0.08). For the 28-d period post-implanting (d 29 to d 56), feeding ESB-6 increased ADG by 10.4% (P = 0.01) and increased G:F by 8.5% (P = 0.03) with no difference in DMI (P = 0.53). Treatment did not affect DMI, ADG, or G:F (P ≥ 0.52) from d 57 to d 84. Feeding ESB-6 with lubabegron (d 85 to d 143) increased ADG by 11.5% (P = 0.05) and tended to improve G:F by 9.5% (P = 0.10). Cumulatively, feeding ESB-6 increased ADG by 7.3% (P = 0.01) and tended to increase G:F by 5.6% (P = 0.08) but did not affect DMI (P = 0.58). Feeding ESB-6 increased final body weight and HCW by 19.5 and 12.2 kg, respectively (P = 0.01) and tended to increase rib fat thickness (P = 0.06) and calculated USDA YG (P = 0.09), with a greater proportion of cattle in YG 4 and 5 (P = 0.02). Treatment did not affect ribeye area, marbling scores, QG distribution, or liver abscess incidence (P ≥ 0.22). Replacing one-third of MDGS on a DM basis with ESB increased ADG and carcass weight and tended to improve feed efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: