The states were probed in and U(VI) and U(V) oxides using x‐ray absorption spectroscopy at the actinide edges. Measured data were analyzed by several approaches, including atomic, crystal‐field theory and the Anderson impurity model, to take into account the hybridization of actinide valence states with oxygen states. For Th(IV), the states are mainly affected by the crystal‐field interaction with the closest neighbors, as can be seen from the corresponding spectrum of . In turn, for U(VI) and U(V) oxides, the U –O charge transfer and high degree of covalency in the chemical bonding play a decisive role increasing the occupancy and consequently governing the ground and excited state properties. That is additionally illustrated by results from the calculations of the U x‐ray photoemission spectra for U(V) in the lattice of La‐doped .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vegelius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: