OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between embryo morphology at the cleavage stage (Day 3) and the blastocyst stage and the likelihood of euploidy. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 519 embryos from 250 patients who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with either oral progestins or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), between 2018 and 2023. Day-3 embryos were classified according to cell number (<8 vs. ≥8) and fragmentation grade (A, B, or C, according to the 2011 Istanbul Consensus). Blastocysts were graded using the Gardner classification and categorized as top quality (≥3BB) or non-top quality. Associations between morphology and ploidy were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among the 519 embryos, 140 (26.9%) were euploid and 379 (73.1%) were aneuploid. Embryos with ≥8 cells on Day 3 exhibited significantly less fragmentation (p<0.001) and were more likely to develop into top-quality blastocysts (50.1% vs. 37.7%, p=0.002). Top-quality blastocysts had nearly twice the euploidy rate of non-top-quality blastocysts (36.9% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001). No significant association was found between Day-3 cell number and euploidy (p=0.550). CONCLUSIONS: Embryos with ≥8 cells on Day 3 were more likely to develop into top-quality blastocysts and exhibited less fragmentation. Although blastocyst morphology was associated with euploidy, Day-3 parameters alone were not predictive. These findings highlight the importance of combining morphological and genetic assessments for embryo selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giovacchini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: