We present a validated, containerised pipeline for Linear Mixed-Effects (LME) analysis of task fMRI, built for reproducibility: the fitting backend must be declared explicitly, outputs are versioned, and every step records a manifest of software, hardware, and parameters. The implementation is cross-validated against the R reference standard (mean |Δ ICC| = 2.2× 10⁻⁶ across 21 regions; significance concordance 21/21) and benchmarked at 19× the per-voxel cost of the GLM, completing a whole-brain analysis in under six hours with 100% convergence. In a case study on emotion task data from 142 HCP subjects (283 runs), voxelwise agreement with the conventional General Linear Model (GLM) is high ( r = 0.94 ), with LME more conservative under FDR correction (74,004 vs. 108,627 significant voxels at q < 0.05 ; Dice = 0.77 ). An intermediate LME omitting the run fixed effect is almost indistinguishable from the GLM (Dice = 0.99 ), locating the sensitivity difference in the run covariate rather than in hierarchical variance decomposition. Whole-brain ICC mapping shows heterogeneous within-subject variability (mean ICC = 0.199 ), and run effects are significant in 13/21 ROIs, surviving adjustment for head motion. This decomposition strategy offers a reusable diagnostic for sensitivity differences between statistical approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orzechowski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: