This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article proposes an idealist/panpsychist metaphysics which connects the integrated information theory of consciousness (IIT) with the work of the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: both frameworks describe the whole universe as consisting of different forms of auto-causation — or, as Schopenhauer termed it, ‘the Will’. IIT proposes that consciousness is self-causality: the ‘information’ being measured in a system (e.g. a set of neurons in the brain) is causality (that is, any difference that makes a difference in the future), while ‘integrated’ means the system ultimately has causal power over itself. Schopenhauer, too, claimed that all matter and energy consists of this kind of conscious self-causality, which makes sense according to Charles Darwin’s idea that what is extant is always that which self-perpetuates. The ‘is–ought problem’ is resolved in this article by explaining causality as valence, or the subjectively-experienced difference between good and bad (understood within this theory as satisfaction vs. frustration of causality from its own perspective).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Nelson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: