Stocker operations occupy a pivotal position in the U.S. beef value chain, purchasing weaned calves and developing them on pasture to feeder-ready weights prior to feedlot placement. In Texas, which accounts for approximately 14% of total U.S. cattle and calves, stocker enterprises simultaneously absorb price risk on both the buy and sell side of every production cycle. The U.S. cattle industry contributed approximately $101.1 billion to total U.S. agricultural receipts in 2023, with feeder and stocker transactions representing a core share of that value. Auction prices for stocker and feeder calves at benchmark Southern Plains markets have exhibited dramatic cyclical volatility over the past two decades, ranging from a 25-year low near $103/cwt in 2003 to an all-time record exceeding $462/cwt in late 2025, a nearly 4.5-fold swing driven by interacting cycles of drought-induced herd liquidation, corn and fuel cost shocks, and shifting domestic and export beef demand. Yet buy-sell decisions across stocker enterprises remain largely driven by market intuition rather than data-driven price forecasts. This study addresses that gap by developing and benchmarking a suite of machine learning and time-series forecasting models for stocker calf auction prices in Texas, with explicit integration of both supply-side cost drivers and demand-side market signals. Six forecasting models were evaluated: three time-series models (ARIMA, SARIMA, SARIMAX) and three multivariate machine learning models (RF, AdaBoost, SVR). The target variable was the weekly average stocker calf auction price ($/Cwt) obtained from USDA AMS auction reports spanning 2017-2026. Six exogenous predictors were compiled across two categories. Demand-side proxies included feeder cattle futures prices and the beef retail/wholesale price spread, reflecting buyer willingness-to-pay and downstream consumer demand pull on stocker prices. Supply-side and macroeconomic drivers included corn prices, natural gas prices, the U.S.-Mexico exchange rate, the Consumer Price Index. All series underwent preprocessing including stationarity testing, seasonal decomposition, and feature engineering prior to model fitting. All models were evaluated under a walk-forward validation framework, this approach replicates real-world deployment conditions and preserves temporal ordering. Model performance was assessed using MAE, RMSE, and R2. Walk-forward validation results demonstrated that machine learning models outperformed time-series approaches across all error metrics. Among time-series models, SARIMAX yielded the strongest performance (R2=0.84), with the inclusion of demand-side predictors improving substantially over the SARIMA and ARIMA baselines. AdaBoost achieved the highest overall accuracy (R = 0.93), outperforming RF and SVR, suggesting that the nonlinear interactions among demand-side and supply-cost predictors exceed the capacity of linear time-series structures to capture. Overall, these results underscore the value of integrating demand-side market signals with supply-cost drivers under a walk-forward framework for stocker cattle price risk management in Texas. Future research should explore weight-class segmentation across Texas production zones and incorporation of drought indices as additional supply-demand proxies. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veettil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: