Reverse transcriptases from bacterial group II introns (GII RTs) demonstrate superior thermostability and processivity compared with retroviral counterparts. While GII RTs have proven advantageous for RNA-seq, their performance in other applications, such as reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), remains poorly studied. RT-LAMP is a widely used method suitable for point-of-care diagnostics of RNA viruses and other pathogens. In this study, we compared the performance in RT-LAMP of GII RT from the thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus flavithermus (Afl RT) with that of the retroviral RNase H-deficient reverse transcriptase M-MuLV. A duplex RT-LAMP targeting SARS-CoV-2 and MS2 phage genomic RNA (internal control) served as a model. Preheating at 95 °C and 1.5 M betaine increased the efficiency of RT-LAMP with both reverse transcriptases. Under these conditions, the optimal temperature range and time of reverse transcription were similar for both enzymes, 55–60 °C and 15 min, respectively. However, high concentrations of Afl RT (>50 U/reaction) inhibited RT-LAMP. Notably, RT-LAMP with Afl RT demonstrated higher sensitivity for detecting both in vitro-transcribed RNA fragments and SARS-CoV-2–positive samples. In validation against RT-qPCR using nasal swabs (200 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 200 negative samples) from patients with respiratory symptoms, the observed sensitivity of RT-LAMP with Afl RT was 100% (200/200; 95% CI, 98.17–100%), whereas with M-MuLV RT, sensitivity was 97.0% (194/200; 95% CI, 93.58–98.89%). Specificity was 100% for both RTs (200/200; 95% CI, 98.17–100%). These observations demonstrate that Afl RT is suitable for RT-LAMP and may increase the sensitivity of LAMP-based diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oscorbin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: