This working paper examines how the classical framing of AI alignment — a static relation between a system and an objective — becomes insufficient once artificial intelligence systems act as agents through time. It introduces a distinction between preservation, legitimate transformation and drift across an agentic trajectory, and proposes trajectory-based alignment as an alternative to state-based alignment. The paper further distinguishes semantic drift from normative drift, situates the argument against recent empirical work on goal drift and governance decay in long-horizon LLM agents, and connects the problem to the Blooming Semantics Institute’s research programme on semantic engineering under incoherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertrand Laugeri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: