This paper examines the contemporary structural shift in international relations from traditional, broad-based multilateral institutions (e.g., the United Nations, WTO) toward "minilateral" frameworks—smaller, ad-hoc, and goal-oriented coalitions of states (e.g., the Quad, BRICS+, AUKUS). Utilizing neoclassical realist and constructivist lenses, this piece argues that minilateralism represents a pragmatic adaptation to gridlocked global governance rather than a total rejection of international cooperation. The implications of this shift for middle-power diplomacy and regional security architectures are briefly evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamza Abubakar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: