Index insurance is promoted for climate risk management, but basis risk limits scalability. This article develops an ex ante, multi-hazard weather-yield index framework for corn in Paraná, Brazil, tailored to the state’s dual-season system (Safra and Safrinha) and the distinct priorities of farmers and insurers. We combine municipality-level yield panels with climate extreme indicators spanning temperature, precipitation, humidity, radiation, wind, and evaporative demand, and evaluate mean- and tail-focused econometric specifications alongside penalised alternatives to guard against overfitting. Basis risk is treated as two-sided and designable by explicitly trading off false negatives (uncompensated losses) and false positives (unnecessary payouts) through a stakeholder-weighted objective, implemented within clustered municipal zones and season-specific windows. Our framework delivers a transparent mapping from alternative basis risk priorities to contract design choices, offering a practical blueprint for piloting credible index insurance where products are not yet established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazviona et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: