Controlling Autonomous AI examines how organisations can retain meaningful control as AI agents are given authority to take consequential actions across enterprise systems. The paper introduces three linked ideas: Control Illusion, where formal controls remain present but no longer constrain the outcome; Control Margin, which tests whether intervention can still take effect before an outcome becomes unavoidable; and global admissibility, which considers whether individually valid actions combine into an unacceptable system state. It proposes IABEI — Identity, Authority, Boundaries, Evidence and Intervention — as an assurance structure for testing whether existing controls form an effective end-to-end control chain. Working paper, Version 1.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Apps (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: