No AccessPerspectives on Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationArticle1 Apr 2004Re-thinking Access to AAC Technologies for Young Children: Simplifying the Learning Demands Janice Light, and Kathryn Drager Janice Light Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Penn State UniversityUniversity Park, PA Google Scholar and Kathryn Drager Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Penn State UniversityUniversity Park, PA Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/aac13.1.5 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1989). Taxonomies and triads: Conceptual organization in one- to two-year-olds.Cognitive Psychology, 21, 156–184. Google Scholar Beals, D. E. (1997). Sources of support for learning words in conversation: Evidence from mealtimes.Journal of Child Language, 24, 673–694. Google Scholar Beals, D. E., & Tabors, P. O. (1995). Arboretum, bureaucratic, and carbohydrates: Preschoolers' exposure to rare vocabulary at home.First Language, 15, 57–76. Google Scholar Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10. Google Scholar Blackstone, S. (1993). Thinking a little harder about communication displays.Augmentative Communication News, 6 (1), 1–3. Google Scholar Case, R. (1978). Piaget and beyond: Toward a developmentally based theory and technology of instruction.In R. Glaser (Ed.). Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 167–228). Hillsdale, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar Drager, K., Light, J., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (in press) Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches.Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research Google Scholar Drager, K., Light, J., Speltz, J., Fallon, K., & Jeffries, L. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2½-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations.Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Fallon, K., Light, J., & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semantic organization patterns of young children: Implications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19,74–85. Google Scholar Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Krackow, E., & Gordon, P. (1998). Are lions and tigers substitutes or associates? Evidence against slot-filler accounts of children's early categorizations.Child Development, 69, 347–354. Google Scholar Light, J. (November, 1992). Cognitive science: Implications for clinical practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Miniseminar presented at the ASHA annual Convention, San Antonio, TX. Google Scholar Light, J. (1993). Teaching automatic linear scanning for computer access: A case study of a preschooler with severe physical and communication disabilities.Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 125–134. Google Scholar Light, J. (1997). 'Let's go star fishing': Reflections on the contents of language learning for children who used aided AAC.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. Google Scholar Light, J. (2003). "Shattering the silence": The development of communicative competence by individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication.In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.). Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: From research to effective practice, (pp. 3–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Light, J. & Drager, K. (2002). Improving the design of augmentative and alternative communication technologies for young children.Assistive Technology, 14 (1), 17–32. Google Scholar Light, J., Drager, K., Burki, B., Hammer, C, Kristiansen, L., & Worah, S. (in progress). Developmental and cultural influences on children's graphic representations of early emerging language concepts: Implications for AAC. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Light, J., Drager, K., Haley, A. & Hartnett, R. (in progress). Drawings of early emerging language concepts by children with disabilities: Implications for AAC Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Light, J., Drager, K., Hayes, E. & Panek, E (in progress). Promoting language development in young children with significant communication disabilities through AAC: Preliminary case studies. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Light, J., Drager, K.McCarthy, J.Mellott, S., Millar, D., Parrish, C, Parsons, A., Rhoads, S., Ward, M., & Welliver, M. (in press). Performance of typically developing four and five year old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques.Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Google Scholar Light, J. & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7186–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when?.Child Development, 3, 978–998. Google Scholar Lund, S., Millar, D., Herman, M., Hinds, A., & Light, J. (November, 1998). Children's pictorial representations of early emerging concepts: Implications for AAC. Poster presented at the ASHA annual Convention, San Antonio, TX. Google Scholar McCarthy, J., Light, J., Drager, K.., Grodzicki, L., Panek, E., & Parkin, E. (in progress). Redesigning scanning to reduce learning demands: A study of the performances of typically developing two year olds. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Miller, J., & Paul, R. (1995). The clinical assessment of language comprehension. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: Emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Paul, R. (2001). Language disorders: From infancy through adolescence. Philadelphia: Mosby. Google Scholar Sharma, R., Schapira, E., Raju, H., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Drager, K., & Rauschert, I. (2004). PerMIP: Personalized multimodal interface platform for people with severe communication disabilities. Grant proposal funded by the Life Sciences Greenhouse of Pennsylvania (LSGPA). Google Scholar Treviranus, J. & Roberts, V. (2003). Supporting competent motor control of AAC systems.In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.). Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: From research to effective practice, (pp. 199–240). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning.Developmental Psychology, 37, 265–279. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research49:1 (113-126)1 Feb 2006Developmental Memory Capacity Resources of Typical Children Retrieving Picture Communication Symbols Using Direct Selection and Visual Linear Scanning With Fixed Communication DisplaysBarry T. Wagner and Heather M. Jackson Volume 13Issue 1April 2004Pages: 5-12 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Apr 1, 2004 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Light et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: