Key result
Vitamin K antagonists linked to greater intracranial calcification burden versus direct oral anticoagulants in older adults.
Why the study?
The association between vitamin K antagonist use and increased intracranial calcifications compared with direct oral anticoagulants in older adults was unclear.
Does the use of vitamin K antagonists increase the burden of intracranial calcifications compared to direct oral anticoagulants in older adults?
Case-Control (n=38)
Does the use of vitamin K antagonists increase the burden of intracranial calcifications compared to direct oral anticoagulants in older adults?
In older adults, the use of vitamin K antagonists is associated with a higher burden of intracranial calcifications compared to direct oral anticoagulants, which may contribute to neurocognitive morbidity.
May favor DOACs over VKAs to limit calcification risk in older adults; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVES: The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is associated with the onset of vascular and soft-tissue calcifications. Whether there are more intracranial calcifications under VKA remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether the regular use of VKA in older adults was associated with an increased burden of intracranial calcifications compared with the use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOA). STUDY DESIGN: Nineteen patients aged 70 years or more using VKA for more than 3 months and 19 controls (matched for age, gender and indication for anticoagulation) using DOA for more than 3 months were consecutively included in this study. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The burden of intracranial calcifications was graded by an experienced neuroradiologist from 0 (no burden) to 3 (high burden) according to the quantity, size, intensity and confluence of calcifications on computed tomography scan of the brain. Age, gender, frontal assessment battery (FAB) score, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, carotid artery stenosis, kidney failure and indication for anticoagulation were investigated as potential confounders. RESULTS: The 19 patients using VKA (median[IQR], 84years[7]; 10females) exhibited a greater burden of falcian calcifications than the 19 controls using DOA (respectively, 2[1] versus 1[2], P = 0.025). Overall, we found that using VKA was directly associated with the global burden of intracranial calcifications (β = 1.54, P = 0.049). No correlation was found with calcifications in sites other than the falx cerebri. CONCLUSIONS: The use of VKA was associated with a greater burden of intracranial calcifications compared with the use of DOA, specifically in the falx cerebri. This finding may explain part of the neurocognitive morbidity met with VKA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annweiler et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Anticoagulation (n=38). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) vs. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) was evaluated on Burden of falcian calcifications (graded 0 to 3) (β = 1.54, p=0.025). Vitamin K antagonist use in older adults was associated with a greater global burden of intracranial calcifications (β=1.54, P=0.049) and falcian calcifications (median 2 vs 1, P=0.025) than DOAs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: