Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proteolytic stability assessment is increasingly viewed as a fundamental component of peptide characterization, arguably of comparable importance as efficacy and toxicity data. A literature survey over the last decade reveals steady growth in the stability information available. However, it also uncovers two significant problems that hinder proper data comparison: 1) the use of different stability assays, and 2) the differences in how stability information is reported. In this Viewpoint, we present results from a database meta-analysis as well as concerns about the stability assessments published so far. We also suggest guidelines for a proper discussion between experts in the field on how to improve data readability so that peptide stability, an often-missing parameter in older literature, is adequately reported to take maximum advantage of it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavaco et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: