Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Global mental health is a relatively new field that has focused on disparities in mental health services across different settings, and on innovative ways to provide feasible, acceptable, and effective services in poorly-resourced settings. Neuroethics, too, is a relatively new field, lying at the intersection of bioethics and neuroscience; it has studied the implications of neuroscientific findings for age-old questions in philosophy, as well as questions about the ethics of novel neuroscientific methods and interventions. DISCUSSION: In this essay, we address a number of issues that lie at the intersection of these two fields: an emphasis on a naturalist and empirical position, a concern with both disease and wellness, the importance of human rights in neuropsychiatric care, and the value of social inclusion and patient empowerment. SUMMARY: These different disciplines share a number of perspectives, and future dialogue between the two should be encouraged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stein et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: