Key result
Anterior MI linked to ~2.5-fold higher cumulative cardiac mortality compared to inferior MI.
Why the study?
The relative prognostic significance of myocardial infarction location and type on clinical outcomes was unclear.
Does anterior location or Q wave type of first myocardial infarction worsen clinical outcomes compared to inferior location or non-Q wave type?
Population
471 patients with a first myocardial infarction
Comparison
Anterior versus inferior infarction; Q wave versus non-Q wave infarction
Design
Observational cohort study with subgroup analyses
Follow-up
Mean 30.8 months
Authors
Loading...
Anterior location of a first myocardial infarction is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality and heart failure, compared to inferior infarction.
Cohort (n=471)
Does anterior location or Q wave type of first myocardial infarction worsen clinical outcomes compared to inferior location or non-Q wave type?
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 11%
p-value: p=<0.001
Anterior location of a first myocardial infarction is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality and heart failure, compared to inferior infarction.
Stone et al. (1988) conducted a cohort in first myocardial infarction (n=471). Anterior myocardial infarction vs. Inferior myocardial infarction was evaluated on total cumulative cardiac mortality (p=<0.001). Anterior myocardial infarction was associated with significantly higher total cumulative cardiac mortality compared to inferior infarction (27% vs 11%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: