Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
World-model BEV perception maintains a persistent temporal latent memory that can be gradually corrupted by perturbations too small to trigger existing per-frame anomaly checks. We formalize this as Slow-Drift Temporal Poisoning (SDTP): frame-wise perturbations bounded by a small digital L∞ budget (ε ≤ 2/255) - a standard proxy for low perturbation magnitude, not a validated measure of human-perceptual imperceptibility or physical-world realizability, jointly optimized across a temporal window via a Backward Temporal Gradient procedure, that reach an 84.3% Temporal Drift Success Rate by frame 32 on BEVFormer-T while evading temporal-consistency defenses calibrated on single-step thresholds. We propose SemantiGuard, a cross-modal defense that cross-checks BEV detections against a frozen vision-language model’s scene description and triggers latent-memory rollback on divergence, reducing the Temporal Drift Success Rate (TDSR) from 91.2% to 13.8% under the primary evaluation configuration (SDTP-L: ε = 4/255, T = 32, BEVFormer-T, Table 6), with a lower 11.2% TDSR observed under the smaller SDTP-M ablation configuration (ε = 2/255, T = 16, Table 7). We also introduce TemporalAdvBEV, a benchmark extending RoboBEV with multi-frame adversarial configurations and drift-specific metrics. These results indicate that temporal memory is an attack surface that BEV security evaluation has not yet accounted for, and that cross-modal semantic verification is a promising, if not yet field-validated, direction for defending it. The paper also introduces TemporalAdvBEV, a benchmark extending RoboBEV with multi-frame adversarial configurations and drift-specific metrics, designed to support evaluation on both nuScenes and Waymo Open, with nuScenes results reported in this manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hallur et al. (2026) studied this question.