Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study experimentally compared a flat-plate photovoltaic-thermal air collector with and without a double-crimped galvanized iron wire mesh. Both units were tested together for eight days under identical outdoor conditions in Noida, India at an optimized airflow rate of 0.0165 kg/s. The hourly and daily means, along with standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals, were calculated; statistical significance tests were carried out; and a sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the mesh-integrated PVT system over the conventional PVT system. The mesh-integrated system maintained a 2.5 °C lower mean PV module temperature and a 2.1 °C higher mean outlet air temperature than the conventional unit. On an annual basis, the mesh-integrated system generated 43.2% higher mean thermal energy, 74.2% higher mean thermal exergy, and 1.9% higher mean net electrical energy than the conventional unit. Overall annual energy and exergy outputs rose by 19.25% and 3.15%, respectively. Despite a 2.5% increase in embodied energy, the mesh-integrated system required 14.18% and 0.58% less time on an overall energy and exergy basis to recover the invested energy. Over a 25-year lifespan, it mitigated 19.21% more CO₂ on an overall energy basis and 3.16% more on an overall exergy basis, yielding higher carbon-credit potential. Therefore, with better energy- and enviro-economic parameters, the mesh-integrated system has enhanced techno-economic and environmental viability over the conventional unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: