Background: Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently experience difficulties in maintaining adequate oral hygiene due to sensory sensitivities, impaired motor coordination, and resistance to conventional toothbrushing techniques¹. Alternative toothbrush designs may help improve plaque control and brushing efficiency in this population.Aim: To assess and compare the effectiveness of manual and triple-headed toothbrushes in children with autism spectrum disorderMaterials and Methods: Forty children diagnosed with ASD were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 20 each). Group A used a triple-headed toothbrush, while Group B used a conventional single-headed manual toothbrush. Oral hygiene status was assessed using the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) at baseline and after two weeks of supervised toothbrushing. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests.Results: Both groups showed a statistically significant reduction in OHI-S scores after two weeks. The triple-headed toothbrush group demonstrated a greater reduction in mean OHI-S scores compared to the single-headed toothbrush group.Conclusion: Triple-headed toothbrushes may be a more effective alternative for improving oral hygiene in children with ASD, particularly where manual dexterity and brushing compliance are limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pandit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: