Oud rosettes have traditionally been discussed primarily as decorative structures covering the sound holes, although their acoustic and mechanical roles remain insufficiently resolved. This study investigates rosette design within a unified vibroacoustic framework. The geometric analysis considers total open area, regional open-area distribution, and total aperture-edge length, whereas the mechanical analysis considers progressive added mass and connectivity/stiffness-proxy configurations. A single fully playable oud and a set of interchangeable experimental rosettes were used to isolate local design changes from inter-instrument variability. For each configuration, the structural response was characterized through bridge-mobility measurements, and the force- normalized acoustic response was measured with a calibrated microphone positioned 1 m from the instrument under standardized conditions. The lightweight geometry series produced comparatively modest, descriptor- specific changes; the clearest openness effects occurred at the fully Closed and Open boundary conditions. Progressive added mass produced the most regular downward shift and reduction of the bridge-mobility peak around 220 Hz, whereas the connectivity/stiffness-proxy series evolved non-monotonically and was dominated by the F4 departure. In the experimental oud examined here, the findings support treating the rosette as a coupled geometric and mechanically interacting component rather than as a decorative cover or an open-area descriptor alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emir Değirmenli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: