Protracted refugee settlements face persistent housing vulnerabilities due to climatic extremities, infrastructural deficits, and resource scarcity. Despite growing global attention to sustainable construction, limited empirical research has examined climate-resilient housing strategies in long-term refugee camps. This study investigates housing typologies in El-Ayoun Camp, one of the largest Sahrawi refugee settlements in Tindouf, Algeria. Using a mixed-methods approach combining field inspections, technical material assessment, and semi-structured stakeholder interviews, the study evaluates four prevalent housing typologies: mud brick, cement block, mixed mud–cement construction, and red brick construction. The findings reveal a critical trade-off between thermal performance and structural durability. Mud-brick houses demonstrate superior thermal comfort but exhibit high vulnerability to torrential rains and flooding. Cement and red-brick constructions improve structural resistance but significantly increase indoor heat accumulation and construction costs. Mixed typologies represent adaptive solutions; however, they lack structural consistency. Across all construction typologies, zinc sheet roofing emerges as the primary thermal and safety vulnerability. The study proposes a climate-resilient refugee housing framework integrating material optimization, thermal regulation, structural reinforcement, and context-sensitive urban planning. The findings contribute to sustainable building design strategies for resource-constrained environments exposed to extreme climatic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Embarec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: