This paper develops the present-record interpretation of temporal observation. It distinguishes a physical record of a past event from the event itself. In cosmology, light emitted under earlier conditions propagates, interacts with a detector, and becomes registered at a later observation event. The resulting record supplies information about the emission without being identical to that emission event. The paper adopts the single-present constraint as an ontological postulate: physical instantiation belongs to the currently actualized configuration, while completed moments do not persist as additional coexisting temporal objects. Statements of present-only existence throughout this paper are made within this postulated ontology. They are not derived from the existence of records alone. Under this constraint, temporal non-storage follows conditionally, and records remain current physical structures with a causal history. The present-record universe permits causal succession, propagation, memory, and reconstruction. It distinguishes the mathematical representation of a history from the physical resources used to encode that history. Its schematic succession of states does not define a universal coordinate clock. Relativistic coordinate freedom alone neither establishes nor refutes the ontological postulate. Finite capacity enters FCLET as a separate physical postulate for bounded operational causal domains under specified resource and resolution conditions. Temporal non-storage alone does not bound the number of distinguishable current states or the amount of information a record can carry. The connection to finite-capacity physics therefore combines present-record ontology with independently specified capacity constraints and latency dynamics. Observable predictions follow from that additional physical construction, whose mathematical development is given in the subsequent articles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yücel Ali Caner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: