Smart transportation systems are increasingly influencing how travelers navigate multimodal networks. However, most routing services are still optimized for time efficiency and offer limited support for safety-aware, human-centric decisions. This gap is significant because travelers’ satisfaction and adoption of multimodal travel depend on how well route guidance reflects real-world trade-offs among efficiency, crash risk exposure, and experiential qualities of the street environment. At the same time, conventional personalization methods that infer preferences from historical behavioral data often face cold-start problems, high data requirements, and limited transferability across contexts. To address these challenges, this study proposes an end-to-end large language model (LLM)–enabled personalized multimodal route planning framework that integrates risk-aware multi-objective route search with human-centric recommendation. Specifically, we first generated Pareto-optimal feasible routes using a label-correcting multi-objective algorithm that jointly considers travel time, mode-specific traffic safety risk, subjective streetscape perception, and transfer burden. Safety risk was quantified through mode-specific multivariate crash models calibrated with historical crash records, and streetscape perception is predicted from street-view imagery using a deep learning model. To facilitate practical deployment, we employed a greedy hypervolume-based sampling strategy to reduce redundancy while maintaining the representativeness of the solution set. Building on the sampled candidate routes, we developed an LLM-based multi-agent recommendation workflow that interprets traveler profiles and trip contexts, generates transparent rationales, and iteratively improves via a self-evolving memory mechanism. Using real-world multimodal network, crash, and street-view data from Daejeon, South Korea, we demonstrate that the proposed framework improves profile–route alignment and identifies alternative routes with lower route-level safety risks across commuting, leisure, and shopping scenarios. The findings suggest that risk-aware, human-centric routing can support safer route-choice decisions in smart mobility services. Furthermore, the self-evolving mechanism mitigates performance disparities across different LLM scales, highlighting a feasible pathway for cost-effective deployment of safety-oriented personalized routing systems in real-world settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: