Complex parameter interactions and acoustic–mechanical–electrical (AcME) impedance mismatches restrict coaxial pulse tube cryocooler (CPTC) performance, whereas previous studies typically optimized isolated cold fingers without compressor dynamic coupling. This study proposes a physics-prior-driven collaborative optimization framework for an integrated AcME-coupled CPTC system. Random Forest screening first compresses the 16-dimensional space to 10 core variables. Across 250 initial samples, the Kriging surrogate achieves baseline determination coefficients of R2=0.9812 for cooling capacity and R2=0.9663 for exergy efficiency. Although initial active learning expands the dataset to 350 samples, uncalibrated frontier exploration still encounters boundary extrapolation errors, inducing solver divergence and an initial 21.82% exergy discrepancy. To prevent search oscillations across non-convergent domains, a sequential active learning loop dynamically couples Constrained Expected Improvement infilling with Pareto feedback, while a Support Vector Machine enforces a numerical solvability boundary (Psafe≥0.85) alongside a power factor threshold (PF≥0.95). Computations deploy an 11-node coarse grid for search iterations and a 50-node fine grid for thermodynamic evaluation. Under fine-grid validation at 80 K, net cooling capacity reaches 14.41 W, and exergy efficiency increases from 14.65% to 17.65%, establishing a verifiable methodology for coupled thermodynamic systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: